Lookmetry

Face shapes

Square face shape

A jaw that holds its width down the face and turns a corner, rather than tapering away.

Also called angular.

Measure your own face shape

What the measurements say

A short-to-moderate face whose jawline turns a corner rather than curving away, giving a flat, angular lower face rather than a tapered one.

The rule that produces it: A jaw that is not narrow and sits more than 4% fuller than an elliptical face outline would predict, with length under 1.2× the width.

A worked example

These are tape measurements that produce a square result. They are checked against the classifier itself, so if the rule ever changed and this example stopped producing this shape, the build would fail rather than the page quietly misleading you.

Measured with a tape, in millimetres
Forehead width128 mm
Face width at cheekbones145 mm
Jaw width125 mm
Hairline to chin190 mm
Cheekbone down to chin95 mm
Jaw corner down to chin level28 mm
The ratios those produce, against what a typical face measures
RatioThis faceTypical
Length over width 1.11 1.15
Forehead over width 0.88 0.86
Jaw over width 0.86 0.8

The length is the hairline-to-chin measurement with 29 mm subtracted, because the photo tool measures from a point on the forehead that sits below the hairline. The tape tool explains that conversion and why it matters.

Telling it apart from what it gets confused with

This is the part most pages on the subject skip, because you cannot write it without a classifier to disagree with. Each of these comes down to one measurement.

Square or round?

Not the jaw's width — its fullness. An ellipse drawn through the cheekbones down to the chin predicts a jaw width; divide the real one by that prediction and a square face comes out above 1.04 while a round one comes out below. Both faces are short. Only the corner differs.

More on the round face shape

Square or triangle?

Whether the jaw is wider than the forehead. A square jaw is wide but not wider than the forehead; once it passes the forehead by 2% the classifier calls it triangle, because at that point the widest part of the face has moved to the bottom.

More on the triangle face shape

What is worth knowing about it

Square is the hardest of the seven to measure, and the tool's threshold for it is the least settled number in the file. The reason is that squareness is not a width. A wide jaw and an angular jaw are different properties, and the obvious measurements confuse them.

An earlier version of this classifier used the angle at the chin between the two jawlines, which sounds exactly right and is not. Measured across real faces, that angle correlates with face length at about −0.92: a shorter face puts the jaw corners closer to the chin, which widens the angle mechanically. So "square" quietly came to mean "short", and collided with round. It was replaced with jaw fullness against an elliptical outline, which is independent of length by construction.

The practical consequence is that a square face cannot be identified from widths alone. Our tape-measure tool needs two extra vertical measurements before it will attempt the distinction, and says so rather than producing a number that would only be restating the jaw width.

Glasses

Rounded and oval frames soften a strong jawline. Rectangular frames repeat it.

Frame shape is the smaller half of the question — the sizes have to fit as well, and those are measurable. Find frame sizes that fit your face, or decode the numbers inside a pair you already own.

Hair

Softness around the jaw — layers, waves, side partings — balances the angle. Blunt chin-length cuts emphasise it.

What each haircut does to these proportions, stated as geometry rather than as a verdict — filtered by what your hair texture can actually hold.

How to find out whether this is your face

Guessing from photographs is unreliable in a specific direction: people tend to pick whichever category they have read most about. Both of our tools report the ratio, the threshold it was compared against, and the runner-up shape when the call was close.

These categories are a convenience rather than a fact. Faces vary continuously across every measurement and the boundaries are lines drawn through that continuum, so a great many faces sit close enough to one that a small change in how the measurement is taken puts them in the next category along. Nothing here scores or ranks anyone's appearance.